THE POWER RANK

  • About
  • Become a member
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
    • CFB Rankings
    • NFL Rankings
    • Football Predictions
    • World Soccer Rankings
    • CBB Rankings
    • March Madness Predictions
    • Overrated CFB teams
    • Contact
  • Members
    • Analysis, Bets
    • My Account
    • Login
  • Log in

How To Find an Overrated Team

By Dr. Ed Feng 2 Comments

Last Thursday, we wrote this in our free email newsletter.

A week ago, we looked Rutgers and their almost 10% chance of remaining undefeated.

But that calculation was based on our team rankings, in which Rutgers is currently 32nd. Our offense and defense rankings reveal another side of this team. Their offense is ranked 85th, while their defense rose to 56th after last weekend. Why is there such a discrepancy between the team ranking and the offense and defense rankings?

Turnovers.

Rutgers is +14 in turnover margin this season. And turnovers are random. For example, the turnovers forced by a defense in the first 6 games explains 2.9% of the variance in turnovers the remainder of the season. The current turnover total is a weak predictor future turnovers.

However, turnovers have almost no affect on yards per play for the offense and defense. When we adjust these numbers for Rutgers’ schedule, they look much worse than their team rank suggests.

Despite being a two touchdown favorite at home, Rutgers lost 35-23 to Kent State on Saturday.

Quarterback Gary Nova threw 6 interceptions. He had thrown only 3 interceptions this season before this game. While we discussed forcing turnovers in the email newsletter, giveaways on offense are also random. In college football, the interception rate in the first 6 games of the season explains only 4.6% of the variance in interception rate the remainder of the season.

To see why the offense has such little control, watch the first 10 seconds of the highlights in which defensive end Mark Fackler makes an incredible one handed pick and runs it back for touchdown. (Sorry, ESPN makes you watch a 15 second commercial first.) That doesn’t happen every day.

While we didn’t expect Rutgers to get exposed so soon, the luck or curse of turnovers can strike at any moment during the season.

If you’re interested in receiving the exclusive content in our email newsletter, please sign up using the form below.

Thanks for reading.

Filed Under: College Football, College Football 2012, College Football Analytics, Football Analytics, Rutgers Scarlet Knights

Can The Big East Crash The National Championship Game?

By Dr. Ed Feng 4 Comments

Fast forward to early December and imagine this scenario.

Alabama has just won the SEC Championship game. The undefeated Crimson Tide claim a place in the National Championship game.

For their opponent, there are two options. The first is a one loss Oklahoma team. While the Sooners lost early to Kansas State, they have steamrolled every opponent since. Their resume includes a decisive win over Notre Dame.

The second option is an undefeated Big East team.

Right now, Rutgers, Louisville and Cincinnati are all undefeated. However, none of these teams have earned a ranking in our top 25. The thought of one of these teams in the National Championship game should make you a bit queasy.

What’s the likelihood these teams remain undefeated?

  • Rutgers (27), 9.5%.
  • Cincinnati (30), 3.2%.
  • Louisville (44), 3.0%.

I was a bit shocked that Rutgers has almost a 10% chance. The Scarlet Knights have Army and Kent State on their remaining schedule, making their road the easiest of these three teams. Their most difficult remaining game comes at Cincinnati.

Rutgers deserves credit for scheduling and winning game at Arkansas this year. It’s not their fault that the head coach got fired during the off season, throwing the program into turmoil.

Would an undefeated Big East team deserve a spot in the National Championship game? Please leave us a comment.

Thanks for reading.

Filed Under: Alabama Crimson Tide, Cincinnati Bearcats, College Football, College Football 2012, College Football Analytics, Football Analytics, Louisville Cardinals, Oklahoma Sooners, Rutgers Scarlet Knights

How Did Sports Illustrated’s Primed to Plummet Teams Do This Weekend?

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

The first contribution of The Power Rank to Sports IllustratedLast week, my first article appeared in Sports Illustrated. On page 32 of the September 24th, 2012 issue, I used yards per play as a metric to determine which college football teams might soon fall in the rankings. Of the 4 teams, Texas didn’t play this weekend. How did the other 3 teams do?

Ohio State

Against one of the worst teams in college football, the Buckeyes had a 21-15 lead late in the 4th quarter. Ohio State gave up 5.03 yards per play to a UAB team that only gained 3.38 the previous weekend at South Carolina. The Buckeye defense has fallen from 22nd at the end of last season to 44th now in our defense rankings. These rankings are based on yards allowed per play adjusted for schedule strength. With this kind of play, they won’t be 14th in the AP Poll for long.

Oklahoma

Kansas State knew they could run the ball against Oklahoma. Coach Bill Snyder’s team ran the ball on 68% of their plays (44 of 65), higher than their 63% from last year that was 12th most in the nation. They gained 4.84 yards per rush and went home with a 24-19 win. The Sooners, who have not overcome their injuries on the defensive line, dropped to 16th in the AP Poll.

South Carolina

The Gamecocks beat a good Missouri team 31-10. While quarterback Connor Shaw won’t go 20 for 21 for 249 yards every game, their mediocre performance against Vanderbilt might be an outlier. South Carolina has jumped to 35th in our pass offense rankings after ending last season at 60th.

So after only one week, 2 of the 3 teams identified as “primed to plummet” struggled. Not a bad start.

Check out all our college football rankings on our premium page, still free at this point in the season.

Filed Under: College Football, College Football 2012, College Football Analytics, Football Analytics, Ohio State Buckeyes, Oklahoma Sooners, South Carolina Gamecocks

27 Numbers Everyone Ought to Know About College Football in the SEC

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

SEC! SEC! SEC!

It’s a chant for an entire conference. Not a team, but a conference.

That’s what happens when one conference has won the last 6 national championships in college football. Not since Vince Young led Texas over USC in the 2006 Rose Bowl has a team from another conference won it all.

How will they do in the upcoming 2012 season?

To find out, we’ll go a numbers fueled romp through the league. Here at The Power Rank, we take sports numbers and adjust them for strength of schedule. On the most simple level, we use margin of victory to calculate our team rankings.

Recently, we’ve expanded our methods to other football numbers such as pass and rush yards per attempt. It provides a complete picture of rushing and passing in college football that accounts for strength of schedule. In this early stage of football analytics, it’s a rather unique set of results. Bill Connelly does some passing and rushing numbers over at Football Outsiders. That’s it.

Here, we’ll look at our numbers from the 2011 season that might have relevance in the upcoming season. Unless otherwise noted, we’re referring to our rankings and rating that account for schedule strength in the content below.

Ready?

Alabama

11. The rank for Alabama’s rush offense from last year. We gave them a 5.46 rating, meaning they would rush for 5.46 yards per attempt against an average rush defense. That’s significantly better than the 4.74 yards per attempt over all Division I games last year. They lose running back Trent Richardson, who was 3rd overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. However, Alabama brings back linemen Barrett Jones, D.J. Fluker and Chance Warmack. The Crimson Tide rush offense will be an interesting test as to the importance of a star running back. (1)

6. Alabama’s rank in 2010. There were coming off a national championship, but went a disappointing 10-3. But with the schedule they played in the SEC West, our team rankings thought quite highly of the Crimson Tide. Nick Saban’s teams don’t fall off too much in their off years. (2)

10. The rank of Alabama’s pass offense last year. Yes, our rankings consider their passing better than their rushing. And it could improve this year with another year of experience for quarterback AJ McCarron. Last year, McCarron was fighting for his job during August practice. At the end of this year, he may go down as one of the greats at Alabama. (3)

LSU

2. The rank of LSU’s pass defense last year, predicted to give up 4.39 yards per attempt against an average pass offense. Teams in Division I averaged 6.22 yards per pass attempt last year. LSU lost 2 cornerbacks to the NFL draft and another, Heisman candidate Tyrann Mathieu, to off the field problems. Despite a tremendous defensive line, LSU’s pass defense rank will slip this year. (4)

2010. The last year LSU fans wanted coach Les Miles’ head on a platter. Two years ago, the Tigers needed a late penalty to squeak by Tennessee and a miraculous bounce on a fake field goal to beat Florida. Of course, all this hot seat talk vanished last year when LSU went undefeated in the regular season and made the National Championship game. However, LSU enjoyed a +20 turnover margin last year. Due to the randomness of turnovers, their turnover margin won’t be as high this year. LSU is the most overrated team in the nation. (5)

South Carolina

3. The number of places South Carolina’s run offense increased after Marcus Lattimore got hurt in the Mississippi State game. South Carolina finished 29th in rush offense. However, we when we only include South Carolina games up to and including the Mississippi State game, in which Lattimore carried 39 times before getting hurt, South Carolina was 32nd. South Carolina’s rush offense got better without Lattimore. Maybe star running backs don’t matter. (6)

4.03. The yards per attempt the stingy South Carolina pass defense allowed last year. When adjusted for strength of schedule, this only slips to 4.39 against an average pass offense, good for 3rd in the nation. They lose 3 starters, including NFL first round draft choice Stephon Gilmore. Expect this unit to regress. (7)

Georgia

2. The number of years in a row that Georgia does not play LSU and Alabama in the regular season. Strength of schedule matters even more in the conference championship game era of college football. Since conferences need at least 12 teams to hold a championship game, teams no longer play every other team in their league. (8)

4.95. The yards per pass attempt Georgia’s expected to give up against an average pass offense. This ranked them 8th in the nation last year. They only lose one starter and have the potential to keep this lofty ranking this season. (9)

28. The number of ranking places that Georgia’s rush defense drops when going from yards per game to our adjusted yards per attempt. They allowed 120.4 yards per game, good for 11th in the nation. Note this number does not include sack yards like the official stats do. However, they allowed 4.16 yards per carry, 17th best in the nation. Adjusting for strength of schedule, Georgia lands at 39th, expected to give up 4.38 yards per carry to an average rushing offense. This drop comes from facing below average rush offenses, something that happens when an SEC team doesn’t play Alabama and LSU. There is potential for improvement this season, as Georgia features 700 pounds of defensive tackles (John Jenkins and Kwame Geathers) in the middle of the defense. (10)

Arkansas

3. The number of times in the last 4 years that Arkansas running back Knile Davis has fractured an ankle. One fractured ankle is bad luck. Two makes one worry. Three becomes a trend. Can Davis stay healthy? (11)

6. The highest rank of a passing offense last year (Arkansas) with a returning starting quarterback this year. Arkansas quarterback Tyler Wilson completed 63% of his passes last year. He loses 3 receivers to the NFL draft, so production at this level remains a question this year. (12)

85. The ranking of Arkansas’s run defense last season. This must improve for the Razorbacks to have any chance of winning the SEC West ahead of Alabama and LSU. Hope springs eternal as they return 6 of their top 8 defensive linemen from last season. (13)

Auburn

2. The number of coordinators that Auburn head coach Gene Chizik had to replace this season. (14)

70. Auburn’s rank in pass offense last year. Even with innovative offensive coordinator Gus Malzahn, Auburn dropped significantly last season after losing quarterback Cam Newton. It’s probably impossible to project into this year, as new offensive coordinator Scott Loeffler will install a pro style offense run by speedy quarterback Kiehl Frazer. But don’t expect the passing offense to move into the top 25. (15)

120. The ranking for Auburn’s pass protection last year after adjusting for strength of competition. They allowed a sack on 9.9% of pass attempts, compared with an average of 6%. This rate only gets worse (10%) when we adjust for strength of schedule. This inability to protect the quarterback most certainly contributed to the poor pass offense. Even with the loss of 3 starters on the offensive line, it will be difficult for a top tier program to protect their quarterback this poorly again. (16)

Texas A&M

11. Texas A&M’s final team rank last year. Don’t let the 7-6 record fool you. The Aggies lost a horde of close games to very good competition. They might not hang so close this season with new coach Kevin Sumlin. (17)

6. Nate Silver’s estimate for how Texas A&M ranks for number of fans. Undoubtedly, the SEC understood the magnitude of this fan base (about 2 million) when it pursued Texas A&M to join its league. (18)

91. The number of places Texas A&M’s pass defense improves with our analytics. In a pass heavy Big 12 last year, they allowed 249.9 yards per game, 106th in the nation. However, the Aggies only allowed 5.78 yards per pass attempt compared with a 6.22 average. This was good for 36th in the nation. When adjusting for facing quarterbacks Robert Griffin III (Baylor) and Brandon Weeden (Oklahoma State), the pass defense rockets up to 15th in the nation. Northwestern threw for a measly 3.35 yards per attempt against this defense in their bowl game last season. One must account for schedule strength in college football numbers. (19)

Florida

3. The number of true road SEC games Florida plays this year. They play a total of 8 SEC games this year, with one neutral site game with Georgia. (20)

-12. Florida’s turnover margin from last year. The Gators only forced 14 turnovers last year. Since forcing turnovers is largely random , one should expect Florida’s turnover margin to vastly improve this season. Things are looking up for 2nd year coach Will Muschamp. (21)

18. Year end ranking for Florida’s run defense last year. The Gators allowed 146.9 yards per game last year, only 39th best in the nation. However, they only allowed 3.99 rush yards per attempt in the run heavy SEC compared to a 4.74 college football average. This was good for 17th best in the nation last year. The adjustment for schedule strength doesn’t change this much. However, they have 10 starters returning on defense, so they could improve on this ranking. (22)

Missouri

18. The rank of Missouri’s rush offense for the 3 games they were without running back Henry Josey. While Missouri finished the year ranked 4th in rush offense, they were still a top 20 rushing attack without their starting back. Good thing, as Josey probably won’t be ready for their first game. Missouri also needs to replace 3 starters on the offensive line. (23)

4. The number of rush defenses in the SEC better than Missouri last year. This number includes Texas A&M, who will also join the SEC this year. The other teams were Alabama, LSU and Florida. Missouri, ranked 24th in rush defense, would have fit in quite well in the SEC last year. This year, they must replace 3 starters along the defensive line. (24)

The Others

84. The highest ranking for any of Mississippi‘s 4 units (pass and rush, both offense and defense). They ran the ball at the level of the 84th best team in the bowl subdivision last year. With 16 starters returning, new coach Hugh Freeze has an incredible teaching job ahead of him. (25)

85. The number of games that Tennessee won in the last 10 years with Phil Fulmer as head coach. This 10 year run started the year after Fulmer led Tennessee to the National Championship. That’s 8.5 wins per year. Tennessee has won 18 games in the 3 years since. That’s 6 wins per year. (26)

38. The rank at which Vanderbilt ended last season. For first year coach James Franklin, it was a significant improvement from the 95th they finished the year before. (27)

Complete list of rankings

Not enough numbers? Check out our complete rankings. It’s a part of our premium college football package that will be free for everyone through the first month of the 2012 season.

Thanks for reading.

Filed Under: Alabama Crimson Tide, Arkansas Razorbacks, Auburn Tigers, College Football 2012, College Football Analytics, Florida Gators, Georgia Bulldogs, LSU Tigers, Missouri Tigers, South Carolina Gamecocks

Stanford’s new quarterback, and other thoughts on the spring football game

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Stanford finished 7th in The Power Rank at the end of last season, a touch behind Wisconsin (7) but more than a point better than Oklahoma (8). But how will the Cardinal fare next season without quarterback Andrew Luck, a top pick in this month’s NFL draft? The spring football game held this past Saturday gave a definitive answer.

Brett Nottingham is a better quarterback than Josh Nunes All the headlines stated that neither of these quarterbacks distinguished themselves. Coach David Shaw said the competition will continue into the fall. But Nottingham was the better quarterback in the spring game. He completed 12 of 19 passes (63%) while Nunes struggled for 11 of 29 (38%). Moreover, when the defense was dominating in the second half, a 20 plus yard Nottingham completion was the only bright spot for the offense. Nunes threw way too many balls that weren’t even close to their target. Even on his long touchdown pass to Ty Montgomery, he missed the window in which his receiver was open. Nunes threw a few moments later, making Montgomery grab the ball between two defenders. It would be shocking if Nottingham isn’t the starter.

The defense was awesome, I think… At one point in the second half, outside linebackers Chase Thomas and Trent Murphy were seemingly in the backfield on every play. The penetration was so irritating that it led to a shoving match with the quarterback at the end of one play. The two linebackers weren’t on the field later in the half when the offense started moving the ball. So is the Cardinal defense “definitely the top defense in the Pac-12, if not the nation,” as Thomas told the San Francisco chronicle when he decided to forego the NFL draft? It’s not out of the question after Saturday. The defense finished 19th in the nation for scoring defense after we adjust for strength of schedule and returns 8 starters. Or was Thomas just licking his chops because Jonathan Martin, the Stanford offensive tackle who will likely be a first round NFL draft pick this year, wasn’t lined up opposed to him? Either way, Cardinal fans are praying that Thomas figures out how to read the option before the Oregon game this year.

The big fellas up front. Entering the spring game last year, the offensive line had to replace 3 senior starters. However, the remaining starters, David DeCastro and Jonathan Martin, were top NFL prospects, and the offense line powered a punishing ground game that gained more than 10 yards per attempt against Washington. But DeCastro and Martin are gone, and their buddies got roughed up on Saturday. The defense pressured on the quarterback all day, a factor in the poor completion rate of Nunes. With a host of top offensive line recruits arriving on campus this fall, could the Cardinal line look much different on September 1 than it did this past Saturday?

Agree? Think Nunes should be the starter? Please leave us a comment.

Filed Under: College Football, College Football 2012, Stanford Cardinal

« Previous Page

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Recent Articles

  • Members: Football analysis for October 24-26, 2026
  • 5-Nugget Saturday, October 17, 2026
  • Podcast: The surprising case for Alabama as a national championship contender
  • Podcast: Michael Fiddle on NFL, NBA betting in 2026
  • Members: Football analysis for October 17-19, 2026

Popular Articles

  • How to make accurate NFL spread predictions
  • Top 5 Tips for Filling Out Your March Madness Bracket
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The craft of sports betting professionals
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool

© 2026 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Looking for smarter sports betting action? The Power Rank’s email newsletter provides a curated list of tips and analytics every Saturday at 10am Eastern.


Valuable. Concise. Entertaining. These are the goals with every correspondence.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
  • Become a member
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
    • CFB Rankings
    • NFL Rankings
    • Football Predictions
    • World Soccer Rankings
    • CBB Rankings
    • March Madness Predictions
    • Overrated CFB teams
    • Contact
  • Members
    • Analysis, Bets
    • My Account
    • Login