THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

Texas Tech stays unbeaten, and 2 other college football predictions for week 9, 2013

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Before we delve into analyzing games, I have an apology.

Previously, I had reported that The Power Rank algorithm predicted 66.8% of winners in college football bowl games from 2005 through 2012. I made a mistake. For the last two seasons, I included the bowl games in the set of regular season games in which I calculated the rankings and predictions. Not fair.

I should have spotted the mistake earlier. I also calculated the prediction accuracy of the Colley Matrix, one of the computer polls in the BCS, with the same data sets. This method predicted 62.4% of game winners, a percentage that seemed high for a system that does not account for margin of victory.

The visual shows corrected results. The Power Rank predicts 63.4% of game winners, a rate competitive with the Vegas line but not quite as good. The Colley Matrix gets 55.1%, consistent with the results of The Prediction Tracker.

Updated results for accuracy of ranking systems at predicting bowl game winners.

Updated results for accuracy of ranking systems at predicting bowl game winners.

Again, sorry. Now let’s look at some football games.

Texas Tech at Oklahoma

AP preview states that Oklahoma ranks first in the nation in pass defense. Man, Texas Tech should have a hell of time throwing the ball against the Sooner defense, especially when redshirt freshman QB Davis Webb will start his 3rd game.

However, tradition college football statistics are stupid in so many ways. First, pass defense statistics do not count sacks as pass plays. As if the offense were running the ball, these negative yards count against rushing statistics. If you include sacks as pass plays, Oklahoma drops to 2nd behind Florida State in pass yards per game.

However, the biggest problem with traditional college football statistics is using yards per game instead of yards per play, a better measure that adjusts for pace of the game. Oklahoma’s pass defense drops to 5th in the nation.

The Power Rank adjusts these pass yards per attempt for strength of schedule. Oklahoma hasn’t played the toughest slate of pass offenses this season. Including sacks in last week’s game, Kansas threw for negative pass yards against Oklahoma. However, Kansas entered the game 112th in pass offense. Oklahoma has also played Louisiana Monroe (114th) and TCU (69th).

After adjusting for schedule, Oklahoma ranks 21st in pass defense, a solid but not elite unit. They face a Texas Tech passing attack that ranks 21st as well. QB Baker Mayfield should get credit for most of this efficiency, as the walk on freshman started until a knee injury against Kansas. However, redshirt freshman Davis Webb hasn’t missed a beat since taking over. In 2 starts, he has thrown for 6.9 yards per play against Iowa State (11th ranked pass defense) and 9.24 against West Virginia (49th).

Texas Tech also has a stout defense, ranked 19th in yards per play adjusted for schedule. This unit made vast improvements last season and continues to improve this season. They face an Oklahoma offense ranked 48th, a match up that favors Texas Tech.

Without any significant turnovers or special teams plays, my numbers see a close game that favors Texas Tech to win (yards per play says 5 points). Hence, the line that favors Oklahoma by 6 doesn’t make sense.

South Carolina at Missouri

A few weeks ago, I estimated Missouri’s chances of winning the SEC East over at Grantland. With the injury to starting QB James Franklin, I assumed their offense would regress towards average.

Then redshirt freshman Maty Mauk threw for 8.2 yards per attempt (6.27 average) against Florida, one of the stingiest defenses in the nation. Missouri’s pass offense shot from 42nd to 18th in my rankings. Can Mauk continue this kind of efficiency?

South Carolina’s defense adds another wildcard factor. This unit ranks 21st in the nation (18th in pass defense), but I have yet to adjust for whether all world DE Jadaveon Clowney decides to play or put forth maximum effort.

On offense, South Carolina lost QB Connor Shaw to an injury last week. They lose some accuracy when back up Dylan Thompson (57% completion rate) takes over for Shaw (63%). South Carolina’s 13th ranked offense can still lean on RB Mike Davis, who has gained 6.7 yards per carry. They face the 17th ranked defense of Missouri.

Yards per play predicts a 6 point win for Missouri at home, while the line predicts a 3 point win. I’m waiting another game to see whether Missouri QB Mauk can keep this offense ticking at the same level.

Abilene Christian at New Mexico State

Abilene Christian is a small school in Abilene, Texas, about a 3 hour drive west of Dallas. It is affiliated with the Churches of Christ and has just under five thousand students. Since you’ve probably never heard of Abilene Christian’s football team, why are they traveling to play New Mexico State this weekend?

It’s probably not for a payout. New Mexico State had no conference when the WAC disintegrated into thin air last season. They play as an FBS independent this season. Head coach DeWayne Walker found the job so stimulating that he left to coach the defensive backs with the Jacksonville Jaguars (no, the NFL has not yet kicked the Jags out of the league for sucking this season).

Abilene Christian is a Division II school in a transition year to the championship subdivision. I presume this allows the game with New Mexico State. Next season, they will play in the Southland Conference, which also adds New Orleans, Incarnate Word and Houston Baptist. Yes, those schools exist and have football teams. The latter two are 239th and 252nd out of 252 schools in my rankings.

Abilene Christian is much better, ranking 193rd, 17 spots ahead of New Mexico State. Both yards per play (13.8) and the team rankings (2.2) predict a victory for Abilene Christian. These calculations come from the 3 games they have played against FCS teams. Despite the small sample size, these games should reflect their best competition.

And, if you’re a really hard core college football fan, you can watch the game on WatchESPN tomorrow night at 8pm Eastern.

Thanks for reading.

Filed Under: College Football, College Football 2013, College Football Analytics, Missouri Tigers, Oklahoma Sooners, South Carolina Gamecocks, Texas Tech Red Raiders

College Football Rankings, First Ever

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

On Saturday, October 31, it was a perfectly lovely afternoon in Palo Alto, and I had the Iowa-Indiana game on while doing the dishes. Up to that point in the season, Iowa remained undefeated with an impressive 11 point win over Penn State at Happy Valley. However, they had squeaked out 2 point wins over Michigan and Michigan St. as well as a meager 3 point win at home over Arkansas St. This would be an interesting team for the Power Rank, since I doubted they would be in the same class as Florida or Alabama. No sooner than this thought passed through my mind, the commentator stated how 5 of the 6 BCS computers had Iowa ranked number 1. That doesn’t pass the stupid test. After looking into it, none of the BCS computers account for margin of victory, since running up the score is frowned upon. Ignoring score difference also doesn’t pass the stupid test. There is useful information in the margin of victory. Including Iowa’s win over Indiana that week, the Power Rank put the Hawkeyes at 10, which seems much more reasonable.

The most eyepopping feature of the current rankings is Texas Tech. Number 10. That was enough to make me check my code. The Raiders have big wins on the road at Nebraska and at home over Oklahoma. They would be even higher had they not gotten stomped by Texas A&M by 22 at home. Neither the BCS, AP poll, or USA Today coach’s poll have them in the top 25, although they are 28 in the AP. Second, there are 9 SEC teams in the top 25. NINE. Numbers say the SEC is tough conference.

Disclaimer: Displaying these rankings in no way supports the current system of determining a national champion in college football. There should be playoffs to crown a champion.

Rankings through November 28, 2009. (Week 13)
1. Alabama, 23.03
2. Florida, 22.27
3. Texas, 20.95
4. TCU, 19.93
5. Boise St., 17.20
6. LSU, 14.20
7. Arkansas, 14.05
8. Tennessee, 13.84
9. Virginia Tech, 13.26
10. Texas Tech, 12.88
11. Oklahoma, 12.87
12. Oregon, 12.87
13. Cincinnati, 12.47
14. Clemson, 11.60
15. Georgia Tech, 11.42
16. Mississippi, 11.24
17. Auburn, 11.18
18. Ohio St., 10.51
19. Miami (FL), 10.04
20. Nebraska, 10.00
21. Stanford, 9.67
22. South Carolina, 8.94
23. Pittsburgh, 8.83
24. Georgia, 8.53
25. Iowa, 8.49

Filed Under: College Football, Iowa, Texas Tech Red Raiders

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • 5-Nugget Saturday, March 25, 2023
  • Alabama’s championship probability
  • Members: Sweet Sixteen futures
  • 5-Nugget Saturday, March 18, 2023
  • Members: NCAA tournament prop bets

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member