THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

Is Gene Chizik a good coach? A look at his head coaching positions.

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

When Auburn hired Gene Chizik as head coach in 2009, it set off a firestorm of controversy. In the previous two years at Iowa State, Chizik had a 5-19 record as head coach. This angry fan was happy to point this out to Auburn athletic director Jay Jacobs. The fan didn’t even get the memo that one win came against FBS opponent South Dakota State. Moreover, Iowa State lost to lower subdivision opponent Northern Iowa. However, Chizik quickly turned Auburn around. In 2010, the Tigers completed a 14-0 season with a National Championship game win over Oregon. With such contrasting tenures as a head coach, how can we know if Chizik is a good coach?

To answer this question, we’ll use the year end rating given by our algorithm for ranking teams. While we usually use the difference in ratings to give a projected point spread, here we use the absolute value of the rating. This value gives how many points better a team is than the average FBS team. However, we can’t just look at the difference between Iowa State in 2008 (-10.0) and Auburn in 2010 (24.9) and conclude that Chizik improved as a coach. Auburn has vastly more resources for football than Iowa State.

Instead, we look at a coach’s tenure compared with the school’s performance before and after this period. A school’s reputation and monetary resources for football are roughly constant over time. Iowa State will not suddenly turn into the money making machine that is Texas football. Some schools such as Oregon and Oklahoma State have received hundreds of million dollars in donations, but even this infusion of money doesn’t change the football team overnight. Here, we show The Power Rank’s rating for Iowa State and Auburn from 2004 through 2011.

The Power Rank looks at Gene Chizik's tenure at Iowa State and Auburn.

Iowa State had some decent teams under Chizik’s predecessor, Dan McCarney. The Cyclones came within a missed field goal of winning the Big 12 North title in 2005. However, Iowa State dropped off significantly in 2006, paving the way for Chizik’s two rough years in Ames. In defense of Chizik, McCarney didn’t leave the cupboard full of talent. After recruiting top 50 classes from 2002 through 2004, McCarney wasn’t able to replicate this feat afterwards. In fact, Iowa State hasn’t had a top 50 class since 2004, suggesting that Chizik didn’t do much to increase the talent level at Iowa State. Paul Rhodes took over in 2009 and has overseen steady progress in the program over the last 3 years. In 2011, Iowa State upset Oklahoma State, costing the Cowboys a shot at the National Championship game.

At Auburn, Tommy Tuberville led the Tigers to an undefeated season in 2004, a year in which they got snubbed from the National Championship game. This Auburn team ended the year with a 21.9 rating, 3 touchdowns better than the average FBS team. However, the program declined over the next 4 years, leading to Tuberville’s stepping down and Chizik’s hiring. In 2010, Chizik landed the 4th best recruiting class, highlighted by quarterback Cam Newton and defensive tackle Nick Fairley. These two junior college transfers led Auburn to the national title. The TIgers ended that year with 24.9 rating. In 2011, Auburn posted 8-5 record with a bowl win over Virginia. However, The Power Rank assigned them a 3.7 rating, not far above the 2.1 they had in 2008, Tuberville’s last season.

It’s unfair to judge a coach until he’s had 4 years at a school and the opportunity to recruit his own players and install his own system. However, Chizik faces an uphill climb, as 43% of his 2009 and 2010 recruiting signees are no longer with the program. Moreover, both of his coordinators are new this upcoming season.

However, we make visuals so you can draw your own conclusions about Gene Chizik’s coaching abilities. Did a cyclone hit Ames in 2007 that made coaching at Iowa State horrifically difficult? Were there mitigating circumstances that let Utah State almost beat Auburn to open the 2010 season? Please leave us a comment.

For more content, follow The Power Rank on Twitter.

Related Posts:

—Can a defense force turnovers?
—College football rankings.
—College football’s incredibly slow progress towards a playoff.
—The Power Rank featured on KALX Spectrum, the science and technology show on UC Berkeley student radio.

Filed Under: Auburn Tigers, College Football, College Football Analytics, Football Analytics, Gene Chizik, Iowa State Cyclones

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • 5-Nugget Saturday, March 25, 2023
  • Alabama’s championship probability
  • Members: Sweet Sixteen futures
  • 5-Nugget Saturday, March 18, 2023
  • Members: NCAA tournament prop bets

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member