THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

College Basketball Wrapup, 2011

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Dependent on three
Butler comes so close again
Fifty-eight percent

In the national championship game, Butler hit a three point shot at the beginning of the second half to go up 6 against Connecticut. While this might seem like a good thing, it wasn’t. Butler built that lead on three point shots, making only one two point basket up until that point. And Butler is not a three point shooting team. Their signature is hard nosed defense. Sure enough, Connecticut slowly crawled back into the game as Butler couldn’t make any shots in the lane and went cold from 3 point land. It’s bad when one can easily recall all of a team’s two point baskets in a game: an Andrew Smith jump hook in the first half, an Andrew Smith layup after an offensive rebound, and a Shawn Vansant jumper. UConn wins comfortably by 12.

Usually, we like to highlight the predictive capabilities of our analytics and mention how the algorithm predicted a UConn win. But predictions are hard and don’t always work out. Kevin Hwang filled out a bracket on espn and yahoo using the rankings (higher ranked team as the winner of each game) and ended up 33.6% and 32% respectively. That’s bad. The brackets were hurt when BYU and San Diego State lost close games in the Sweet Sixteen. The bracket were decimated when none of the one seeds made the Final Four, leaving the bracket with no teams for the last weekend of the tourney. At the beginning of the tourney, Ohio State had separated from the pack but the next 13 teams were separated by only 4 points in their ratings. So the higher ranked team in many tourney games had only a slight edge. Imagine drawing a line in your bedroom that splits it into regions of 60% and 40% of the floor space. If one spun around and randomly flung pieces of clothing around, it’s unlikely that they all land in the 60% region. It’s analogous to picking the higher ranked team in each game in your bracket. We’ll work on something better for next year.

However, The Power Rank did much better on a game by game basis. In our tournament preview, we highlighted 6 teams seeded higher than 10 that might pull a first round upset. Three of these teams won, the number we expect if each team had an equal chance of winning the game. Overall, we went 34-24-1 against the line, passing on the remaining 8 games. This corresponds to a 58.6% winning percentage.

Filed Under: Butler Bulldogs, College Basketball, Connecticut Huskies, Sports Wagering

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • Members: Super Bowl game and prop analysis
  • 7-Nugget Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Cincinnati at Kansas City, AFC Conference Championship Game
  • Podcast: Dr. Eric Eager on the NFL Conference Championships
  • Members: Football analysis for NFL Conference Championships

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member