THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

The problem with golf analytics at The Open

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Matt Fitzpatick has been on a tear. He has five top 10 finishes in his last six tournaments, and this includes a win at the US Open.

Data Golf ranks Fitzpatrick 5th in the world. It seems like a no brainer that he should be favored over Jordan Spieth, the 20th ranked golfer. In their match up section, Data Golf gives a 57.8% chance that Fitzpatrick beats Spieth.

However, there are limitations to predictive golf analytics.

On an episode of The Football Analytics Show, Matt Courchene, the analytics guru behind Data Golf, explained how his model has problems with golfers like Spieth. The model uses years of data, and it doesn’t react too much to a stretch of good performance.

This analysis is based on research over all golfers. However, Spieth might be an exception. He rocked the golf world with two wins and a 2nd place at majors in 2015. He won another major in 2017.

Spieth’s past performance suggests a high ceiling. Data Golf should have a different reaction to a stretch of good play from Spieth than an average golfer. Right now, it doesn’t.

On my podcast, Matt admitted that his model is probably sluggish to react to Spieth compared to the markets. This season, Spieth has five top 10 finishes and a win at the RBC Heritage.

Two other reasons also favor Spieth over Fitzpatrick:

  • Spieth excels at The Open. For example, he won this major in 2017 and finished 2nd last season.
  • Circa has better win odds for Spieth (+1800) than Fitzpatrick (+2100).

This suggests value on Spieth +100 in a match up over Fitzpatrick at DraftKings.

In no way do I mean to denigrate the work on Data Golf. In fact, their work has significant market influence.

Some sports books go to the extent of copying Data Golf’s match up probabilities. This is lazier than finding a wife in a catalog from Eastern Europe.

It’s also another reason why you might like Spieth in a match up over Fitzpatrick.

Check out Matt Courchene’s appearance on The Football Analytics Show podcast at any of these places:

  • The Power Rank
  • YouTube, with links to various segments
  • Spotify
  • Apple Podcasts

The top 5 sports betting podcast episodes

This article was sent to The Power Rank’s email newsletter at 11:20am Eastern on Wednesday, July 13. This newsletter is a free service that strives to be:

  • Valuable
  • Concise
  • Entertaining

The primary focus of the newsletter is NFL and college football based on my predictive analytics.

If you sign up for this free newsletter, I’ll send you my top 5 sports betting podcast episodes, the ultimate education for your ears.

To get this free service delivered straight into your inbox, enter your best email address and click on “Sign up now!”








 

 
 

Filed Under: Golf, The Power Rank Newsletter

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • 5-Nugget Saturday, March 25, 2023
  • Alabama’s championship probability
  • Members: Sweet Sixteen futures
  • 5-Nugget Saturday, March 18, 2023
  • Members: NCAA tournament prop bets

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member