THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

Northwestern at Michigan preview on Detroit News

By Dr. Ed Feng 1 Comment

Screen Shot 2015-10-09 at 3.54.11 PMOver at the Detroit News, I previewed the Northwestern at Michigan game.

Both teams have great defenses. The markets predict a total of 35 points, not far from The Power Rank prediction of 38.7. It will be a slow, ugly game.

However, Northwestern has an offense that ranks worse in my numbers than the Maryland team that Michigan shut out last week.

In addition, Northwestern defends the pass better than the run. This plays into the hands of Jim Harbaugh, who has run of 57% of plays.

To read the full article, click here.

Filed Under: College Football, College football 2015, College Football Analytics, Detroit News Column, Michigan Wolverines, Northwestern Wildcats

BYU at Michigan and other football predictions for Sept 26-27

By Dr. Ed Feng 1 Comment

It’s the last weekend in September, and it’s time to separate the contenders from pretenders in college football. Let’s look at some games.

Michigan by 5.5 over BYU

There are 3 reasons I think this prediction might be low.

First, Michigan has a really good defense. As expected, they have played well in all 3 games this season. However, you might brush off the UNLV game as too poor an opponent to draw any conclusions.

However, UNLV gained 493 yards on 5.67 yards per play in their opener against Northern Illinois. Last week, Ohio State had 298 yards on 4.52 yards per play against the same defense.

This in no way says that UNLV has a better offense than Ohio State. Variance plays a huge role in these results. In addition, UNLV QB Blake Decker was a little banged up against Michigan.

However, this suggests we can take seriously the 235 yards on 3.79 yards per play Michigan’s defense allowed against UNLV.

Second, Michigan’s defense faces BYU’s back up QB Tanner Mangum, who took over after Heisman caliber starter Taysom Hill got hurt. Mangum, a former four star recruit who recently returned from his Mormon mission, has looked solid in 3 games.

However, luck has played a big role in his results. He threw a 42 yard hail mary to win the game against Nebraska. In addition, Boise State’s secondary let his receivers get behind them twice for gains of 80 and 74 yards. This most likely won’t happen against Michigan.

Third, there’s the Jake Rudock factor. Many Michigan fans have seen the QB’s play as shaky through 3 games. However, he’s completing 65% of his passes for 6.14 yards per play, just below the college football average.

I don’t think it’s time to worry about Rudock. He’s made some bad throws, some of which have resulted in interceptions. I expect his play to improve.

Get the rest of my best predictions

I save my best college and pro football predictions for members.

However, each week, I offer a sample of these predictions to the curious football fans who sign up for my email list. This content (except for samples like the BYU at Michigan preview above) doesn’t appear on this site.

To get all of these predictions, sign up for this free email newsletter. It goes out at 2pm Eastern on Friday afternoon.

To sign up for the free email newsletter, just enter your email address and click on “Sign up now!”








Filed Under: Brigham Young Cougars, College Football, College football 2015, College Football Analytics, Michigan Wolverines

Win probability for the Big Ten East in 2015

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Screen Shot 2015-09-23 at 3.35.27 PMOver at the Detroit News, I used analytics to assign a preseason win probability for each team in the Big Ten East.

My favorite part of the article was questioning the dominance of Ohio State.

Before the season started, people acted like the Buckeyes were the greatest team in college football history. However, looking at their track record through analytics over the past 3 season reveals a different story.

Ohio State looked amazing against Virginia Tech in a revenge game from last season (Virginia Tech came to Columbus and won). Then they have looked putrid on offense against Hawaii and Northern Illinois.

I still think they’re one of the two best teams in the nation. But let’s not put them in the playoff just yet.

Michigan State and Michigan also have a chance at the Big Ten East title, with Penn State as an intriguing fourth option.

To read the article, click here.

Filed Under: College Football, College football 2015, College Football Analytics, Detroit News Column, Michigan State Spartans, Michigan Wolverines, Ohio State Buckeyes, Penn State Nittany Lions

Detroit News article on Michigan’s win total in 2015

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Screen Shot 2015-08-18 at 9.30.24 AMOver at the Detroit News, I transitioned from baseball to college football with a preview of Jim Harbaugh’s first year as Michigan’s coach.

I had already written a Michigan preview for 2015 on this site, so I spiced up the Detroit News article with a visual on the rich tradition of the program.

My preseason model still expects 7.7 wins for Michigan, but this makes no adjustments for the coaching change.

To read my Detroit News article on Michigan in 2015, click here.

Next week, I preview Michigan State, an interesting team with which to contrast the numbers from subjective opinion.

Filed Under: College Football, College football 2015, College Football Analytics, Detroit News Column, Jim Harbaugh, Michigan Wolverines

Predicting Michigan’s win total in Jim Harbaugh’s first year

By Dr. Ed Feng 8 Comments

harbaugh_streetsHow many games will Michigan win in 2015? Can they rise to the level of Ohio State and become relevant on the national stage?

This seemed like a fantasy for Michigan until the hiring of Jim Harbaugh, one of the best coaches at both the college and pro level. For a suffering Michigan fan base, it felt like getting a new Porsche for a 17th birthday.

The conventional wisdom says that Harbaugh will bring Michigan back to national prominence. And this is a good thing. Love or hate the Michigan program, college football becomes more interesting with the increased relevance of brand programs.

But will Michigan win many games this year? Here, we’ll use analytics to get a baseline expectation in 2015.

First, let’s take a closer look at the coach himself.

Stunning success as a coach

To understand the excitement in Ann Arbor over the hiring of Harbaugh, let’s look at what happened during his time at Stanford.

This visual shows a 30 year history of Stanford football. The rating in the bottom panel is an expected margin of victory against an average FBS team according to my computer calculations of team rankings.

stanford_harbaugh

Harbaugh took a team that went 1-11 the year before he arrived and turned Stanford into an elite college football team. He brought a culture of toughness and physicality to the program. It also helped that he recruited QB Andrew Luck, a future number one overall NFL draft pick.

The Harbaugh culture lives on at Stanford even years after his departure for the San Francisco 49ers. The program continues to win despite the questionable decisions made by current coach David Shaw.

Why is Harbaugh a good coach? Many articles have been written about his complete devotion to coaching football. ESPN’s Seth Wickersham wrote that “everything that isn’t coaching football is a distraction” to Harbaugh, which makes him seem rude at times.

However, there’s more to Harbaugh’s greatness. He also understands people. Consider this story about his wife Sarah from a recent Sports Illustrated profile.

People often ask Sarah what it’s like when Jim yells at her, and she tells them, “He’s never yelled at me.” She yells sometimes, but he doesn’t yell back. He just tells her the real reason she is mad, and he is usually right, and yes, that can be maddening. Sometimes it would be easier if he just yelled.

Great coaches can motivate their players. Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski doesn’t create innovative basketball strategies. Instead, he gets people and what makes them tick. Same for Phil Jackson.

Can Harbaugh make a difference in 2015? Let’s estimate the talent he has to work with.

Michigan in The Power Rank’s preseason rankings

In 2014, Michigan went 5-7, which led to the firing of coach Brady Hoke. While the firing seemed justified, I don’t know how many coaches survive a season with a -16 turnover margin (takeaways minus giveaways) and a senior QB Devin Gardner whose performance regressed.

While my preseason model doesn’t account for Gardner, it does consider the turnover margin. There’s a lot of randomness in turnovers, which implies that teams with large negative (or positive) values in this statistic are unlikely to have such extreme values the next season.

There is no guarantee in this regression to the mean. In the three years that Rich Rodriguez coached Michigan, the team had a turnover margin of -10 or worse. But by the numbers, Michigan is unlikely to perform worse than -16 in turnover margin this season no matter who coaches them.

In addition to turnovers, the preseason model also considers a program’s performance over the past four seasons and returning starters. Despite the simplicity of the model, which does not consider coaching changes, it has predict the winner in 70.4% of games since 2005. In addition, the higher ranked team has won 60.2% of bowl games from 2005 through 2014.

Michigan is 34th in my 2015 preseason rankings, almost exactly what SB Nation’s Bill Connelly expects.

They’re not in the same class as Ohio State (2nd), or even Wisconsin (14th) and Michigan State (16th) in the Big Ten. However, Michigan sits between Nebraska (32nd) and Penn State (38th).

Michigan is better than many of the other Big Ten opponents on their schedule. This will impact their expected win total.

For the full preseason rankings, click here.

Want more preseason college football analysis? Keep up to date with my content through the free email newsletter. Enter your best email and click on “Sign up now!”








The most important player in 2015

Heading into the 2015 season, Michigan fans are stressing about quarterback. Devin Garnder struggled last year, and the offense ranked 71st in yards per play adjusted for strength of schedule, The Power Rank’s primary metric for evaluating offense and defense.

With the graduation of Garnder, rising sophomore Shane Morris looked like the best quarterback in spring practice. However, he showed the same inaccuracy in the spring game (11-24) that has plagued his career. While the 135 passing yards looks good, he got most of those throwing against a running back attempting to play cornerback (Dennis Norfleet).

I agree with Brian Cook of mgoblog.com that Morris will almost certainly lose the QB job to Jake Rudock, the graduate transfer from Iowa. Rudock started two years and completed 60.3% of his passes, almost the exact same percentage as Gardner. However, Rudock will most likely be better reducing turnovers, as he threw interceptions on 2.6% of his passes, much less than the 4.1% of Garnder.

It’s becoming cliche to say that Rudock raises the floor for Michigan in 2015. However, the most important player should be high ceiling talent that allows the team to exceed expectations. For Michigan, that’s Jabrill Peppers.

Peppers was the top ranked cornerback recruit in 2014. As the third ranked recruit overall that season, recruiting guru Sam Webb thought he was vastly underrated. He played a few games last season before getting injured and will move to safety this season.

Peppers has the potential to take a Michigan defense ranked 17th by adjusted yards per play last season up into the top 10 or 5. Throw in some lucky bounces that turn into takeaways, and the Michigan defense could carry this team above expectations.

Breaking down the schedule

To determine how games Michigan will win, let’s break the schedule into four tiers.

  • Almost certain wins: UNLV (97.3%).
  • Very likely wins: Oregon State (82.2%), BYU (67.2%), at Maryland (75.2%), Northwestern (77.7%), Rutgers (83.3%), at Indiana (74.0%).
  • Toss up games: at Utah (40.4%), Michigan State (45.5%), at Minnesota (53.9%), at Penn State (46.1%)
  • Unlikely wins: Ohio State (23.5%)

Unless an earthquake swallows the Big House, Michigan will beat UNLV. They have greater than 66% chance in another 6 games, which results in 4 or 5 more wins. If they can win two of four toss up games, that’s 7 or 8 wins for the season.

Adding the win probabilities in Michigan’s 12 games gives an expected win total of 7.7, very close to the market total of 7.5. Simulations of the season give Michigan a 56% chance to win 8 or more games.

Overview

The expected 7.7 wins by my preseason model makes no adjustments for the Harbaugh factor. If he can establish his brand of physical football this season, Michigan can exceed these preseason expectations.

Michigan should also vastly improve on special teams. Harbaugh hired special teams coach John Baxter, who had a remarkable track record at Fresno State and USC. With a timely blocked kick, Michigan steal an extra game.

Want more Michigan content from a numbers point of view? I’m part of the MGoBlog Roundtable with Sam Webb, Brian Cook and Craig Ross on WTKA. The radio starts up again in August (Thursday mornings at 9am).

Filed Under: College football 2015, College Football Analytics, Football Analytics, Michigan Wolverines

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • 5-Nugget Saturday, June 3, 2023
  • Members: 2023 NFL preseason predictions for all 272 games
  • 5-Nugget Saturday, May 27, 2023
  • Podcast: John Sears on sports analytics
  • 5-Nugget Saturday, May 20, 2023

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • World Soccer/Football
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member