THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

Finally!! Preseason college football rankings for 2017

By Dr. Ed Feng 3 Comments

My preseason college football rankings consider recent team performance, turnovers and returning starters.

While simple, the model has predicted the game winner in 70.8% of games the past 3 seasons (1452-598 with no prediction in 235 games). This set of games excludes FCS cupcake games.

Here is my quick reaction to the these rankings:

— Ohio State seems a bit low at #4, although QB J.T. Barrett and the offensive line struggled last season.

— Stanford at #7 seems a too high. The Cardinal return a ton of talent on both sides of the ball but have a big question mark at QB with Keller Chryst.

— Washington, Penn State, USC. These teams had spectacular seasons in 2016. However, my model doesn’t like them since they haven’t been elite over the 4 year window the model considers.

— LSU at #9 seems about right for this program. However, they have a new coach that went 10-25 at his last SEC head coaching job.

— Auburn had a great defense last season, and transfer QB Jarrett Stidham looked like a star in limited time at Baylor. But I was still surprised how high my numbers put Auburn.

— Michigan. Can we talk about them later? Let’s just say their preseason rank seems low, way low. They will require an adjustment before I release their win total.

— Notre Dame had an awful 2016, but the preseason model thinks that might have been an outlier for Brian Kelly’s program.

— Tom Herman takes over at Texas, but the model’s rank of 37th shows just how bad the program got over the past 3 years under Charlie Strong.

— My alma mater Rice can return 16 starters yet still rank 116th in FBS and 5th worst in an awful Conference USA. It’s been a rough two seasons for the Owls.

The following list gives the rank, team and rating, which is an expected margin of victory against an average FBS team, for the 2017 preseason college football rankings.

1. Alabama, 22.67
2. Clemson, 18.43
3. Florida State, 18.21
4. Ohio State, 16.90
5. Oklahoma, 16.12
6. Auburn, 14.32
7. Stanford, 13.57
8. Wisconsin, 13.56
9. LSU, 13.01
10. Washington, 12.39
11. Penn State, 12.02
12. Miami (FL), 11.58
13. Louisville, 11.56
14. Georgia Tech, 9.94
15. USC, 9.70
16. Virginia Tech, 9.67
17. Georgia, 9.67
18. Florida, 9.63
19. Texas A&M, 9.45
20. Tennessee, 9.23
21. Washington State, 9.04
22. TCU, 8.64
23. Notre Dame, 8.60
24. North Carolina State, 8.28
25. North Carolina, 8.26
26. Mississippi, 7.90
27. Houston, 7.50
28. Iowa, 7.22
29. Baylor, 7.17
30. Michigan, 7.06
31. Oklahoma State, 6.96
32. Northwestern, 6.93
33. Kansas State, 6.84
34. Oregon, 6.37
35. Vanderbilt, 6.35
36. Pittsburgh, 6.21
37. Texas, 6.08
38. Mississippi State, 6.02
39. UCLA, 5.52
40. Minnesota, 5.24
41. Arkansas, 5.17
42. Kentucky, 5.04
43. Western Michigan, 4.51
44. Texas Tech, 4.20
45. Duke, 3.89
46. Utah, 3.86
47. South Florida, 3.65
48. Brigham Young, 3.48
49. South Carolina, 3.46
50. Colorado, 3.28
51. Syracuse, 2.60
52. Nebraska, 2.44
53. Indiana, 2.41
54. Toledo, 2.38
55. Troy, 2.24
56. Colorado State, 2.04
57. Memphis, 1.92
58. Missouri, 1.87
59. Wake Forest, 1.73
60. Arizona State, 1.50
61. Western Kentucky, 1.46
62. Navy, 1.44
63. West Virginia, 1.05
64. Temple, 0.88
65. Boston College, 0.42
66. Oregon State, 0.16
67. Appalachian State, 0.07
68. Boise State, -0.12
69. Arizona, -0.27
70. Tulsa, -0.48
71. California, -0.56
72. Michigan State, -0.61
73. San Diego State, -0.67
74. UCF, -1.17
75. Army, -1.23
76. Virginia, -1.56
77. Maryland, -2.01
78. Wyoming, -2.62
79. Ohio, -2.99
80. Iowa State, -3.12
81. Louisiana Tech, -3.73
82. Central Michigan, -4.13
83. SMU, -4.57
84. Northern Illinois, -4.86
85. Coastal Carolina, -5.22
86. Georgia Southern, -5.27
87. UTSA, -5.49
88. Arkansas State, -5.55
89. East Carolina, -6.03
90. Air Force, -6.09
91. Middle Tennessee State, -6.36
92. Georgia State, -6.41
93. Miami (OH), -6.51
94. Southern Miss, -6.67
95. Hawaii, -6.87
96. Akron, -6.95
97. Marshall, -6.99
98. Tulane, -7.00
99. Louisiana Lafayette, -7.11
100. Old Dominion, -7.25
101. Cincinnati, -7.63
102. South Alabama, -7.83
103. Bowling Green, -8.00
104. Purdue, -8.05
105. Rutgers, -8.05
106. San Jose State, -8.17
107. Utah State, -8.33
108. Eastern Michigan, -8.64
109. Louisiana Monroe, -8.70
110. New Mexico, -8.75
111. Florida Atlantic, -9.07
112. Ball State, -9.15
113. Connecticut, -9.19
114. Illinois, -9.27
115. Fresno State, -9.32
116. Rice, -10.65
117. Massachusetts, -10.92
118. Nevada, -11.01
119. Kent State, -11.15
120. Kansas, -11.17
121. Idaho, -12.04
122. UNLV, -12.09
123. Buffalo, -12.77
124. North Texas, -13.00
125. New Mexico State, -14.01
126. Florida International, -15.19
127. Texas State, -15.66
128. UTEP, -17.57
129. Charlotte, -19.20
130. UAB, -19.85

Filed Under: College Football, College Football 2017

« Previous Page

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • Podcast: Hitman on NFL betting, Super Bowl LVII
  • Members: Super Bowl game and prop analysis
  • 7-Nugget Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Cincinnati at Kansas City, AFC Conference Championship Game
  • Podcast: Dr. Eric Eager on the NFL Conference Championships

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member