THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

College football early season adjustments, 2018

By Dr. Ed Feng 3 Comments

After two weeks of the 2018 season, we need to make adjustments based on this season’s data.

We want adjustments that considers strength of schedule.  However, there is not yet enough data from this season to apply my algorithm to game results.  The algorithm requires that all teams get connected in a network, which happens after week 3 or 4.

Instead, let’s take the margin of victory for a team and compare it against the median closing point spread on Don Best.  This considers strength of schedule in that the markets account for the strength of both teams.

Here are the average points by which FBS teams have covered the spread.  Positive numbers imply that a team did better than expected by the closing spread.  (The record in parentheses is in games straight up, not against the spread.)

These numbers inform my early season adjustments in my member predictions.  To learn more about becoming a member, click here.

1. Boise State, (2-0), 24.25
2. Vanderbilt, (2-0), 23.00
3. Cincinnati, (2-0), 22.50
4. Ball State, (1-1), 21.50
5. Utah State, (1-1), 21.00
6. Kent State, (1-1), 20.75
7. Appalachian State, (1-1), 19.25
8. Louisiana, (1-0), 18.50
9. Hawaii, (3-0), 18.00
10. Maryland, (2-0), 17.50
11. Fresno State, (1-1), 16.75
12. Colorado, (2-0), 16.50
13. Arizona State, (2-0), 16.00
14. Virginia Tech, (2-0), 15.75
15. Liberty, (1-1), 15.25
16. Toledo, (1-0), 14.50
17. Coastal Carolina, (1-1), 14.25
18. Oklahoma, (2-0), 13.75
19. Eastern Michigan, (2-0), 13.50
20. Alabama, (2-0), 13.50
21. Air Force, (1-1), 12.50
22. Mississippi, (2-0), 12.25
23. Mississippi State, (2-0), 11.75
24. Minnesota, (2-0), 11.50
25. Kentucky, (2-0), 11.25
26. Duke, (2-0), 11.25
27. Georgia Southern, (2-0), 11.25
28. Iowa, (2-0), 11.25
29. Ohio State, (2-0), 10.25
30. Penn State, (2-0), 10.25
31. East Carolina, (1-1), 9.75
32. Washington State, (2-0), 9.75
33. North Texas, (2-0), 9.00
34. West Virginia, (2-0), 9.00
35. Stanford, (2-0), 8.25
36. Boston College, (2-0), 8.25
37. Houston, (2-0), 8.00
38. Virginia, (1-1), 7.75
39. Syracuse, (2-0), 7.75
40. Texas A&M, (1-1), 7.50
41. Kansas, (1-1), 7.25
42. Tulsa, (1-1), 6.62
43. Memphis, (1-1), 6.50
44. Georgia, (2-0), 6.00
45. Brigham Young, (1-1), 5.75
46. Army, (1-1), 5.25
47. Texas Tech, (1-1), 5.25
48. UNLV, (1-1), 4.75
49. Tulane, (1-1), 4.62
50. Missouri, (2-0), 4.50
51. LSU, (2-0), 4.25
52. Michigan, (1-1), 4.00
53. Southern Miss, (1-1), 4.00
54. Florida International, (1-1), 4.00
55. Oklahoma State, (2-0), 3.25
56. South Florida, (2-0), 3.00
57. California, (2-0), 2.50
58. TCU, (2-0), 2.50
59. Buffalo, (2-0), 2.25
60. North Carolina State, (2-0), 2.25
61. Nevada, (1-1), 2.00
62. Oregon State, (1-1), 1.50
63. Tennessee, (1-1), 1.25
64. Illinois, (2-0), 0.50
65. New Mexico, (1-1), 0.50
66. UCF, (2-0), 0.50
67. Utah, (2-0), -0.75
68. Oregon, (2-0), -1.00
69. Rutgers, (1-1), -1.25
70. Miami (FL), (1-1), -1.50
71. Louisiana Tech, (2-0), -2.00
72. Auburn, (2-0), -2.00
73. Indiana, (2-0), -2.00
74. Massachusetts, (1-2), -2.08
75. Wake Forest, (2-0), -2.25
76. South Alabama, (0-2), -2.50
77. Rice, (1-2), -3.00
78. Wyoming, (1-2), -3.33
79. Georgia State, (1-1), -3.50
80. Washington, (1-1), -3.50
81. Marshall, (2-0), -4.00
82. Western Kentucky, (0-2), -4.00
83. San Jose State, (0-2), -4.50
84. Troy, (1-1), -4.75
85. Wisconsin, (2-0), -5.00
86. Louisiana Monroe, (2-0), -5.50
87. Northwestern, (1-1), -5.75
88. South Carolina, (1-1), -6.25
89. Baylor, (2-0), -6.25
90. Iowa State, (0-1), -6.50
91. Charlotte, (1-1), -6.75
92. USC, (1-1), -6.75
93. Northern Illinois, (0-2), -7.00
94. Georgia Tech, (1-1), -8.00
95. Nebraska, (0-1), -8.00
96. Notre Dame, (2-0), -8.00
97. Akron, (1-0), -8.50
98. UAB, (1-1), -9.00
99. San Diego State, (1-1), -9.00
100. Bowling Green, (0-2), -9.00
101. UTEP, (0-2), -9.25
102. Arkansas State, (1-1), -9.25
103. Clemson, (2-0), -9.88
104. Middle Tennessee, (1-1), -10.00
105. UCLA, (0-2), -10.00
106. Colorado State, (1-2), -10.00
107. Florida, (1-1), -10.25
108. Purdue, (0-2), -10.50
109. Arkansas, (1-1), -10.50
110. Navy, (1-1), -11.75
111. Michigan State, (1-1), -12.00
112. UTSA, (0-2), -12.50
113. Central Michigan, (0-2), -12.50
114. Western Michigan, (0-2), -13.25
115. SMU, (0-2), -13.25
116. Temple, (0-2), -13.75
117. Texas State, (1-1), -14.25
118. Miami (OH), (0-2), -15.00
119. Texas, (1-1), -15.75
120. Louisville, (1-1), -15.75
121. Florida Atlantic, (1-1), -16.25
122. Kansas State, (1-1), -17.50
123. Connecticut, (0-2), -18.00
124. North Carolina, (0-2), -18.75
125. New Mexico State, (0-3), -19.33
126. Pittsburgh, (1-1), -19.50
127. Arizona, (0-2), -20.00
128. Florida State, (1-1), -24.75
129. Ohio, (1-0), -25.50
130. Old Dominion, (0-2), -26.00

Filed Under: College Football

Comments

  1. Vincent S says

    September 12, 2018 at 11:25 am

    Thanks for the update. One blowout with your advice about very limited samples(2 games) may not give an accurate comparable,(your good advice) but is very interesting. It seems that if you could take those preseason predictions that were spot on with the point spread in one group and then those in blowouts seperatly. Correct me if I’m wrong but I would think that the teams or games that covered closest to the average ending point spread early on would lead to better predictability versus continual blowouts. Thanks for what you do.

    Reply
  2. Vincent S says

    September 12, 2018 at 12:08 pm

    Expanding on my previous comment:
    It it likely that the Markets will adjust and maybe over adjust. Expecting for example Vanderbilt or Boise state to do better then they are capable of ? Causing them to not get enough points versus power teams? So many thoughts. If was easy it wouldn’t be any fun. Thanks again.

    Reply
    • Dr. Ed Feng says

      September 12, 2018 at 12:14 pm

      I believe in small adjustments these first few weeks of the season. Boise, Vandy are probably better than we expected preseason, but hard to make big claims after two games.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • Podcast: Hitman on NFL betting, Super Bowl LVII
  • Members: Super Bowl game and prop analysis
  • 7-Nugget Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Cincinnati at Kansas City, AFC Conference Championship Game
  • Podcast: Dr. Eric Eager on the NFL Conference Championships

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member