THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

The two faces of Michigan’s offensive line in 2017

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

How is Michigan’s offensive line developing? As Tony Kaminski wrote, there were high hopes heading into the season that Jim Harbaugh could replicate the rushing success of his Stanford teams.

To measure the contribution of the offensive line on running plays, we look at Line Yards, a metric developed by Football Outsiders.

Based on regression analysis, the Line Yardage formula takes all running back carries and assigns responsibility to the offensive line based on the following percentages:

  • Losses: 120% value
  • 0-4 Yards: 100% value
  • 5-10 Yards: 50% value
  • 11+ yards: 0% value

The offensive line gets full credit for the first 4 yards of any run, but decreasing credit for the next 6 as the running back gets past the defensive line. The line gets no credit for yards beyond 10 as the running back gets into the secondary.

As the visual shows, Harbaugh saw a sharp increase in line yards for his Stanford teams. His first two Michigan offensive lines have disappointed.

Based on play by play data, here is the line yards for Michigan in the 2017 season.

  • Florida: 2.86
  • Cincinnati: 2.55
  • Air Force: 2.68
  • at Purdue: 2.41
  • Michigan State: 3.19
  • at Indiana: 3.23
  • at Penn State: 3.48
  • Rutgers: 3.62

The offensive line did a good job run blocking against Michigan State and Penn State, an easy thing for Michigan fans to miss in two difficult losses. I was shocked at the Penn State number.

In addition, Indiana has a solid defense as well. The last 4 games have been a stark contrast to the poor performances against Cincinnati, Air Force and Purdue (who might have a decent defense).

How about pass protection? This shows the sack rate allowed for Big Ten teams.

1. Minnesota, 3.65%
2. Nebraska, 4.13%
3. Michigan State, 4.33%
4. Ohio State, 4.53%
5. Iowa, 4.55%
6. Rutgers, 4.90%
7. Wisconsin, 5.03%
8. Indiana, 5.41%
9. Purdue, 6.95%
10. Penn State, 7.24%
11. Northwestern, 7.67%
12. Illinois, 8.71%
13. Maryland, 9.71%
14. Michigan, 9.79%

Despite not allowing a sack against Rutgers, the pass blocking has been bad in 2017.

The numbers suggest that Michigan’s offensive might be improving in run blocking, but has struggled in pass protection.

Thanks to the Michigan Sports Analytics Society, as I wrote the Line Yards code as part of a lesson I presented at one of their meetings.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • Podcast: Hitman on NFL betting, Super Bowl LVII
  • Members: Super Bowl game and prop analysis
  • 7-Nugget Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Cincinnati at Kansas City, AFC Conference Championship Game
  • Podcast: Dr. Eric Eager on the NFL Conference Championships

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member