Florida State won the national championship last season. With Heisman winning QB Jameis Winston’s returning for this season, the Seminoles looked poised to repeat as champions.
On the surface, things look fine for Florida State. They have beaten Clemson (without Winston) and Notre Dame on the way to an undefeated record. As the visual shows, the college football playoff committee ranked them 2nd in their first rankings.
However, numbers reveal another side of Florida State. Computer rankings that take margin of victory in games and adjust for strength of schedule aren’t impressed. For example, both my team rankings and the Sagarin predictor rank Florida State 20th.
Florida State doesn’t look better when we dig deeper into the numbers.
On this site, I take yards per play and adjust for schedule to rank offense and defense. Florida State shows up at 29th when combining offense and defense into a team ranking. On Football Outsiders, Bill Connelly and Brian Fremeau combine both drive and play based statistics before making schedule adjustments. They rank Florida State 11th.
Good computer rankings do not consider Florida State a top 10 team.
And the Seminoles face a stern test against Louisville tonight.
Florida State’s offense against Louisville’s defense
Jameis Winston and the Florida State offense have been great this season, ranking 7th in my adjusted yards per play. This unit led the comeback over North Carolina State from a 17 point deficit to win that game.
However, they face Louisville’s 3rd ranked defense. This is an incredible performance for a unit that lost 3 of 4 defensive line starters from last season.
Moreover, Florida State has struggled with pass protection this season. Defenses have sacked the QB on 5.8% of pass attempts, right near the 6% average. Louisville’s defense has generated sacks on 9.3% of pass attempts. Expect a long night for Winston.
Florida State’s defense against Louisville’s offense
Remember how Winston and the offense saved Florida State’s ass against North Carolina State? How does a team get 17 points down to an ACC door mat?
The defense stinks.
Well, the defense doesn’t stink. They rank 34th in my adjusted yards per play. Some teams would kill for a defense that good. However, a rank of 34th means severe regression for a Florida State defense that finished the last 2 seasons in the top 5.
The pass rush has been a problem. Florida State has sacked the QB on 4.2% of pass attempts. Notre Dame’s Everett Golson had ample time to look downfield against the Seminole’s defense.
However, Louisville’s offense hasn’t been great this season. They rank 69th by my adjusted yards per play, and QB Will Garnder has completed 57% of his passes, a steep decline from the 70% Teddy Bridgewater put up last 2 seasons. The offensive line hasn’t helped Gardner much, as Louisville has allowed sacks on 9.1% of pass attempts.
Louisville did get receiver DeVante Parker back from injury against North Carolina State. The preseason All-ACC receiver caught 9 passes for 134 yards in his only game of the season.
Prediction for Florida State at Louisville
Florida State has the edge in this game because their defense is better than Louisville’s offense. The Power Rank’s ensemble predictions give Florida State a 1.5 point edge.
However, if Louisville QB Will Gardner gets some time to throw to DeVante Parker, they might put up enough points to pull the upset. My numbers give them a 45.5% chance to win.
The markets also see the strength in Louisville. The opening line of Florida State by 7 moved to 3.5 by this afternoon.
Ensemble predictions for week 10
These predictions are a collaboration with Mike Craig, my partner in the prediction service. We use rankings based on margin of victory and yards per play as well as data from the markets to compute the spread and total in every game.
In this sample of predictions, the first number is a point spread in which a negative number predicts a victory for the home team. The second number is the total points scored by both teams.
All of these math predictions are available to members.
Kentucky at Missouri: -10.2, 48.5.
Boston College at Virginia Tech: -3.0, 41.3.
Illinois at Ohio State: -21.2, 62.4.
Arizona at UCLA: -10.8, 65.6.
Rice at Florida International: 5.1, 48.8.
Tennessee at South Carolina: -5.5, 56.8.
Northwestern at Iowa: -2.9, 41.2.
Brigham Young at Middle Tennessee State: 6.1, 62.4.
Virginia at Georgia Tech: -4.6, 59.0.
San Diego State at Nevada: -2.2, 50.5.
Arkansas at Mississippi State: -12.4, 58.6.
Wisconsin at Rutgers: 10.8, 60.5.
Oklahoma State at Kansas State: -11.9, 51.7.
Indiana at Michigan: -5.3, 59.2.
Georgia State at Appalachian State: -6.8, 70.5.
East Carolina at Temple: 13.0, 64.1.
California at Oregon State: -0.9, 63.9.
North Carolina State at Syracuse: -4.6, 57.8.
Cincinnati at Tulane: 7.4, 58.9.
Air Force at Army: 3.7, 57.3.
Wyoming at Fresno State: -8.5, 60.4.
You say no computer rankings have FSU in the top 10, but Massey has them #5. http://www.masseyratings.com/rate.php?s=cf&sub=FBS In FEI, they are #8. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/fei Anderson & Hester has them #2. http://www.andersonsports.com/football/ACF_frnk.html This chart appears to show every computer ranking used in the old BCS formula as ranking FSU in the top 10: http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compsum.htm So, care to explain what you meant by that statement?
Ed Feng says
It’s possible to have FSU in the top 10. And it’s probable if you only consider wins and losses and not margin of victory.
In computer rankings that I trust, FSU isn’t in the top 10. This agrees with their games I’ve seen.
I was sloppy in my language in the article. I’ve fixed the problem. Sorry.
Every talking head in the planet is picking L-Ville tonight.
Until I saw this I was all in with Ed.
Now, not so sure.