THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • CBB Rank
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
  • Log in

What football analytics says about yards per point as an efficiency metric

By Dr. Ed Feng 6 Comments

Get Smarter through Football Analytics

Some metrics are like getting a football stuck in a tree.

I’m a big fan of the Sloan Sports Analytics Conference. I even posted on their blog saying anyone interested in sports analytics must attend.

But sometimes they get it wrong.

This year, they accepted the talk “Identifying an accurate metric for football efficiency”. Tim Chou, a football coach, discovered yards per point as the new way to evaluate football teams.

There are many problems with this premise.

First, yards per point is not a new concept. Phil Steele, who publishes a yearly preseason magazine, has been writing about it for years.

Second, yards per point is not a good metric for football. Randomness plays a big role in its value, mostly due to turnovers. Phil Steele uses it as a metric to determine teams that got lucky the previous season.

Over at Bill Connelly’s Football Study Hall, I discuss the problems with yards per point as a football efficiency metric. Kansas State’s offense from last season is a perfect example of these problems. To read the article, click here.

After seeing this article, Jeff Fogle at Stat Intelligence wrote a post in which he remembers questioning yards per point back in 1986. This is neither a new or particularly useful concept.

Filed Under: College Football, College Football Analytics

Comments

  1. Jim says

    July 10, 2013 at 5:10 pm

    Interesting.

    I think YPP is at least a good predictor if you’re looking at “one” stat to predict a winning percentage. I think a YPP differential is better, when you take YPP for offense and a YPP for defense and subtract the two, as I’ve done here: http://pac12statcentral.com/testsite/temp/scatter/public_html/ (Plot y as winning & and x as YPP differential). It provides a 78% R^2

    Another good “single” predictor is Pass efficiency differential margin, where you take a differential of a team’s offensive and defensive pass efficiencies. This obviously has drawbacks (especially for teams that are pass heavy or don’t pass at all). Anyway, the link I shared will let you try out some different combinations of stats to see what correlates with what. It is one of the new interactive features I will have on my site this fall. knowhuddle.com

    Reply
    • Ed Feng says

      July 10, 2013 at 6:55 pm

      Jim,

      Good stuff, thanks for sharing. Please let us know when your site is up.

      Yards per point is a good predictor… of the past. There’s no doubt that it correlates strongly with winning percentage. The problem is that I’m looking for metrics that predict the future.

      Reply
      • Craig says

        July 17, 2013 at 9:46 pm

        Thanks to both of you for providing tools such as this for those of us who lack the mathematical acumen to create them ourselves.

        I went to the link and played with it for a while and had two thoughts, one for each of you.

        Jim – is there a reason the drop downs are ordered the way they are? It would make it easier to use if they were alphabetized.

        Ed – do you think this would help, say, halfway through the season or do you think the sample size would be too small? Also, another thought, the non-conference games don’t give an accurate picture compared to in-conference games for the BCS conferences. I’m glad this is the last year I’ll have to use BCS to describe anything!

        Reply
        • Ed Feng says

          July 18, 2013 at 12:02 pm

          Craig,

          Sample size is always an issue in college football. I think the tool is useful in finding correlations in past seasons. Then we kind of assume that they will continue to hold this season.

          Reply
  2. Tom says

    August 2, 2013 at 11:55 am

    Hi Guys. I’ve been doing a lot of research with regard to yards per point and trying to derive a predicted points scored in a game from this statistic. So far the randomness factor of turnovers, etc… tends to leave the results a bit further away from where I want them to be. I have a complete statistical analysis for every college football team (FBS) and I’m able to accurately predict total yards for each team, within a margin of error of about +/- 25 yards a game for each team. Does anyone have any thoughts on a better metric than yards per point that might be more useful in predicting scores? I’m always looking for new and efficient ways of evaluating games.

    Reply
    • Ed Feng says

      August 2, 2013 at 12:28 pm

      Tom, thanks for stopping by. I would try yards per play to attempt to predict points scored. This is on my to do list. Let’s compare notes when we both do it.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Data driven betting information

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.

To sign up for The Power Rank's email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches
  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods

Recent Articles

  • 7-Nugget Saturday, February 4, 2023
  • Podcast: Hitman on NFL betting, Super Bowl LVII
  • Members: Super Bowl game and prop analysis
  • 7-Nugget Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Cincinnati at Kansas City, AFC Conference Championship Game

© 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Smarter sports betting in less than 5 minutes

Valuable. Concise. Entertaining.


These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football.


To sign up for The Power Rank's free email newsletter, enter your best email and click on "Sign up now!"


No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • World Soccer/Football
    • College Basketball
    • College Football
    • NFL
    • NFL passing success rate
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
  • Members
    • CBB Rank
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member