THE POWER RANK

  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • NFL
    • College Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
    • CFB yards per play
    • World Soccer/Football
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
    • COVID-19 Policy
  • Log in

Is Denard Robinson a Better Passer in the Shotgun or Under Center?

By Dr. Ed Feng Leave a Comment

Based on a WolverineNation article, an estimate of Denard Robinson's pass completion percentageMichael Rothstein at WolverineNation of ESPN had an interesting article about Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson yesterday. They found that Robinson has a better completion percentage under center than in the shotgun formation. Over his career, Robinson completed 65.7% of his passes under center (46 for 70) while only completing 56.3% of his passes in the shotgun (316 for 561).

In football, we’re always looking at a small number of events. As we’ve wrote about before at The Power Rank, there are big problems with making judgements after a small number of events. I got interested in the significance of these pass completion numbers.

The problem is that 65.7% is only an estimate of Robinson’s true completion percentage under center. His actual percentage might be 55.8%. Due to the randomness of college football, we measure 65.7% over the sample size of 70 throws. Maybe his receivers made some jaw dropping catches on bad throws. Of course, his actual percentage might also be 70% because his receivers are dropping lots of passes. We don’t know with certainty.

However, with a simple probability model, we can calculate a distribution of pass completion percentages for Denard Robinson under center. As shown in the figure, this distribution has a bell shaped curve with a width. We can do the same for his completion percentages in the shotgun formation. Since he’s had so many more attempts, the width of this distribution is much smaller. The more throws we see Denard make, the more certain we become about his abilities. Both of these curves are shown in the figure. (The curves both have the same area underneath them. The curve for the shotgun rises much taller due to the narrow width.)

With all this uncertainty, there’s a probability that Robinson is actually a better passer in the shotgun than under center. Intuitively, you can see that in the overlap of the distributions. With a simple numerical experiment, we determined that there’s only a 6% chance that Robinson is better in the shotgun. ESPN’s conclusion will be right 94% of the time, which is pretty good.

But back to football. Rothstein also notes that Robinson runs the ball much better out of the shotgun. Michigan will still set up in the shotgun to take advantage of his explosive speed.

Thanks for reading.

Filed Under: College Football, College Football Analytics, Denard Robinson, Football Analytics, Michigan Wolverines

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Predictions from Ed Feng

I use my Stanford Ph.D. in applied math to make football and March Madness predictions.

To get a sample of my best American football predictions and March Madness cheat sheet, sign up for my free email newsletter.

Enter your email and click on "Sign up now!"

Popular Articles

  • How to win your NCAA tournament pool
  • The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics
  • How to predict interceptions in the NFL
  • Accurate football predictions with linear regression
  • The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL
  • Football analytics resource guide
  • The Reason You Can’t Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size
  • The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings
  • How computer rankings make you smarter about sports
  • How to win your college football bowl pool
  • Do you make these 3 mistakes with college football statistics?
  • The Top 10 Things to Know About The Power Rank’s Methods
  • 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches

Recent Articles

  • Podcast: Ed Feng on How to Win Your March Madness Pool
  • Podcast: Adam Stanco on Predicting March Madness 2021
  • Podcast: Rufus Peabody on Predicting the Super Bowl and Props
  • Members: Super Bowl Props
  • Podcast: Matt Freedman on Predicting Super Bowl Player Props

© 2021 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved.

About, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy

Get a sample of my best football predictions

While I usually save my best predictions for paying members of the site, I offer a sample in my weekly email newsletter.


To get this service, sign up for my free email newsletter.


Enter your email and click on "Sign up now!"

No thanks, I'll make predictions without data and analytics.

{"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}
  • About
    • About The Power Rank
    • Start Here
    • Contact
  • Predictions
    • Games
    • March Madness
  • Content
    • Must Read
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • March Madness Book
  • Rankings
    • College Basketball
    • NFL
    • College Football
    • MLB
    • Cluster Luck
    • CFB yards per play
    • World Soccer/Football
  • Members
    • My Account
    • Login
    • Become a member
    • COVID-19 Policy